非法与瑕疵:证据排除的新适用  

Illegal and Defect:The New Application of Evidence Elimination

作　　者：丁娟[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江工业大学法学院,浙江杭州310023

出　　处：《浙江工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第3期334-338,360,共6页Journal of Zhejiang University of Technology：Social Sciences

基　　金：浙江工业大学人文社科研究基金项目(20110135)

摘　　要：非法证据排除规则体现了刑事诉讼中实体正义与程序正义之间的冲突,非法证据的取舍问题一直是我国刑事诉讼法学界争论的焦点。两个证据规则的出台明确了非法证据排除规则在我国的正式确立,但该规则同时规定有瑕疵证据,二者在证据的基本属性上有本质的差异,对其排除与适用规则也有不同规定:非法证据一律排除,瑕疵证据则可以有条件转化适用。Illegal evidence eliminating principles reflects the conflict between entity justice and procedure justice in criminal litigation,and the conflict between acceptance and refusal of illegal evidence is always the focus in the procedural law circle.The two regulations issued by the related department mark the establishment of the Exclusionary Rule of Illegally Obtained Evidence.But the Defective Evidence is essentially different from Illegal Evidence.Exclusionary Rule of Defected Evidence and Rule of Illegally Obtained Evidence have its own application condition.All the Illegal Evidence shall be excluded,but the Defective Evidence in certain condition can be used.

关 键 词：非法证据 瑕疵证据 证据排除 公正 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]