“一对一”带教制在本科护理学生实习中的效果研究  

Evaluate the effect of the system of＂ one to one＂ in undergraduate nursing practice

作　　者：臧萍[1] 于金玲[1] 刘宏[1] 陈淑芹[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东潍坊医学院附属医院护理部,261031

出　　处：《国际护理学杂志》2011年第10期1453-1455,共3页international journal of nursing

基　　金：科研项目：山东省高等医学教育研究中心课题[2007-3-34]

摘　　要：目的探讨“一对一”带教制对本科护理学生实习效果的影响。方法2007年～2009年329名在潍坊医学院附属医院实习的本科护生随机分为两组。“一对一”带教组（实验组）166名，在实习过程中，每到一个科室都由一个老师带教，直到本科室实习结束。传统带教组（对照组）163名，在实习中，每个科室都没有固定的老师带教，只根据相应的班次跟随老师实习。实习结束前比较两组护生理论考试、操作考核成绩。同时发放问卷调查护生对带教老师满意度和护生对护理职业的认同度。结果两组护生理论考试成绩无差异（P〉0．05）。“一对一”带教组操作考核成绩高于传统带教组（P〈0．01）。结论“一对一”带教制对护生临床操作的指导优于传统带教方式。Objective To investigate the effect of ＂ one to one＂ system of teaching in undergraduate nursing practice. Methods A total of 329 undergraduate practical nurses from 2007 ~ 2009 were divided into two groups, teach group （ test group） had 166 nurses. Each department was led by a teacher in the process of practice until the department end its practice. The traditional teach group （ control group） had 163 nurses, but each department had not the regular teachers in practice, the nurses just followed the teachers according to the corre- spondent order of department. The nursing students were compared for the theory test and the operation test before the end of practice, and the questionnaire was given to the nurses in order to get the proportion of the students who were satisfy with their teachers and the recognition of the nursing profession at the same time. Results Two groups of nursing students had no difference on theory test （P 〉 0. 05） . But the teach group （test group） was better than thato of traditional group （P 〈0. 01 ） . Conclusions The ＂ one to one＂ group （teach group） is should taken advantage over the traditional teach group.

关 键 词：“一对一”带教制 护理本科 实习 效果 

分 类 号：R47-4[医药卫生—护理学]