论真实的知识  

The True Knowledge

作　　者：詹秀娟[1] 

机构地区：[1]东南大学人文学院,江苏南京211189

出　　处：《南通大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第5期11-16,共6页Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：历史的长河并没有对真实的知识一锤定音,形成一种定论。真实的知识随着时代和环境的变迁一起发生变化。亚里士多德推崇以自然的存在方式沉思完全实现的知识为最高和最真实的知识;笛卡尔在"我思,我在"的基础上构筑着真实的知识体系;康德借助先天综合判断和物自体的区分论证真实的知识的情形,召唤不同层次的真实的知识进入不同的领域。真实的知识的三种论证方式及其内在逻辑的敞开,召唤我们思及映现真实的知识的人的真实的存在方式;对人的的真实的存在方式的理解,让我们最为自然地沉思着真实的知识所引发的时代问题。The long history doesn＇t have a final definition true knowledge,because the definition of true knowledge is always changing with environmental changes and time changes.Aristotle believed that complete knowledge can be achieved through meditation,and that the highest and most authentic knowledge should be achieved in a natural way.Descartes built true knowledge on the basis of ＂I think,I am＂,while Kant distinguished true knowledge with synthetical judgments and the distinction between phenomenon and thing-in-itself,and he called on the true knowledge to have different accesses to different areas.Three demonstrations of true knowledge and the inner logical opening of them call on us to think the true existence for the realization of being human.The perception of real being of humans help us ponder the modern problems caused by true knowledge in the natural way.

关 键 词：知识 真实 召唤 人 

分 类 号：B022.3[哲学宗教—哲学理论]