我国行政程序证据制度的缺失及其影响  

The Influence of Missing of Administrative Procedure Evidence System in China

作　　者：王维民[1] 

机构地区：[1]武警学院边防系,河北廊坊065000

出　　处：《武警学院学报》2011年第9期34-37,共4页Journal of the Armed Police Academy

摘　　要：依法行政不能仅强调行政行为"依照法律、法规、规章的规定进行","公正合法的程序、正确地认定事实"也是依法行政的应有之义。基于此,我们需要行政程序法,更需要行政程序法对行政程序中的证据问题作出明确、科学而详细的规定。而我国目前尚无行政程序证据制度可言,行政机关在实践中为防止成为被告而承担败诉的风险,只得按照行政诉讼证据规则要求自己。但行政管理的特殊性与行政行为的多样性决定了行政机关不应照搬繁琐而严格的行政诉讼证据规则。实践中行政机关照搬行政诉讼证据规则会产生排异反应,造成诸多不适应。＂Fair and lawful procedures,correctly identified the facts＂ is necessary for the administration according to law besides the fact that executive act should be in accordance with laws,regulations.Based on this,the clear,scientific and detailed evidence issue must be provided in the law of administrative procedure.However,there is no administrative procedure evidence system,and there are only the rules of evidence in administrative litigation are abided by the administrative authorities in practice in order to prevent the risk of losing case.But administrative departments should not copy the complicated and strict rules of evidence in administrative litigation because of the special nature of the administration and the diversity of administrative acts.This is because copying the rules of evidence in administrative litigation in practice will result in rejection and many problems.

关 键 词：行政程序 行政程序证据制度 行政程序证据 行政行为 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]