检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:尹榕[1] 叶建军[2] 石向群[1] 张志强[1] 侯雪湄[1] 张晓燕[1] 杨金升[1]
机构地区:[1]兰州军区兰州总医院神经内科,730050 [2]兰州军区兰州总医院MRI室,730050
出 处:《临床放射学杂志》2011年第10期1433-1436,共4页Journal of Clinical Radiology
摘 要:目的探讨对比增强磁共振血管造影(CE-MRA)对颈动脉狭窄及狭窄程度的诊断价值。资料与方法对54例有临床缺血症状的患者行CE-MRA检查后1周内行DSA检查,将其颈动脉影像学结果进行比较。结果 CE-MRA对颈动脉狭窄的敏感性、特异性、假阴性、假阳性和诊断符合率分别为94.12%、91.89%、5.88%、8.11%和92.59%;对狭窄程度进行分级后再次进行准确性的比较,发现CE-MRA对颈动脉狭窄的敏感性、特异性、假阴性、假阳性和诊断符合率分别为91.67%、80.95%、8.33%、19.15%和83.33%;将正常血管剔除后进行狭窄程度准确性比较,其诊断符合率为55%。结论 CE-MRA可作为颈动脉狭窄的一种筛查手段,但仍无法准确评价颈动脉狭窄的程度。Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of CE-MRA in the diagnosis of the carotid stenosis.Materials and Methods Fifty-four patients with clinical ischemic symptoms were examined by CE-MRA,then digital subtraction angiography(DSA) within one week later.The results of CE-MRA and DSA were compared.Results The sensitivity,specificity,false negative rate,false positive rate and diagnostic accuracy of CE-MRA in diagnosis of carotid stenosis were 94.12%,91.89%,5.88%,8.11% and 92.69% respectively;After classifying the degree of stenosis,we compared the diagnostic accuracy again and found out that the sensitivity,specificity,false negative rate,false positive rate and diagnostic accuracy of CE-MRA in diagnosis of carotid stenosis were 91.67%,80.95%,8.33%,19.15% and 83.33% respectively;The accuracy of CE-MRA in the diagnosis of the stenosis degree was 55%.Conclusions CE-MRA was able to be used as a screening method in the diagnosis of the carotid stenosis,but it could not accurately evaluate the degree of carotid stenosis.
分 类 号:R743.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62