对公共领域结构转型批判的批判  

A Critique of a Critique of the Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere

作　　者：高海青[1] 史云峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]中共中央党校,北京100091

出　　处：《华南理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第5期67-72,共6页Journal of South China University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：哈贝马斯的《公共领域结构转型》自刊出至今引起广泛争议,包括欧洲的社会历史学家和非欧洲的社会历史学家都参与到讨论之中,德国特里尔大学Andreas Gestrich在总结各种争端的基础上从五个方面对哈氏的理论展开批判,并以卢曼的社会分化理论作为可替代方案整合各种哈氏理论中存在的困难,这一替代方案在解释公共领域时也存在深刻的问题,因此运用社会建构主义视角对Andreas Gestrich的观点加以批判和建构是必要的。The publication of The Structure Transformation of the Public Sphere is highly controversial.Both a broad range of European historiographies and historians of non-European societies examined the question of the public sphere.Based on the disputes,Andreas Gestrich criticizes Habermass theory from five aspects,and turns to Luhmanns theories of distinction to hold these different new aspects together.There are profound problems in the replacement framework in the interpretation of the public sphere,so its necessary to use the social constructivism to criticize Andreas Gestrichs view point.

关 键 词：哈贝马斯 卢曼 Andreas Gestrich 公共领域结构转型 分化理论 社会建构主义 

分 类 号：F019.5[经济管理—政治经济学]