自行编制的社区抑郁状态电话筛查问卷与常用抑郁和焦虑评定量表的一致性研究(下)  被引量:16

The study on the correlation of community depression status phone screening questionnaire with conventional depression and anxiety scales

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:田德财[1] 张新卿[1] 周景升[2] 姜凤英[1] 刘学娜[1] 方向华[3] 

机构地区:[1]首都医科大学宣武医院神经内科,北京100053 [2]首都医科大学宣武医院康复科 [3]首都医科大学宣武医院社会医学部

出  处:《中国神经精神疾病杂志》2011年第10期618-620,共3页Chinese Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases

基  金:国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)(编号:2008AA02Z414)

摘  要:目的研究自行编制的社区抑郁状态电话筛查问卷(community depression status screeningquestionnaire via telephone,CDSQ-T)与Hamilton抑郁量表(Hamilton depression rating scale,HAMD)、Hamilton焦虑量表(Hamilton anxiety rating scale,HAMA)、Zung抑郁自评量表(self-rating depression scale,SDS)、Zung焦虑自评量表(self-rating anxiety scale,SAS)的相关性和一致性。方法对14~86岁458例门诊患者同时先后进行CDSQ-T与HAMD、HAMA、SDS、SAS量表的评估。比较CDSQ-T与四个量表总分的相关性和一致性。线性关系采用线性回归模型分析。结果 Pearson相关分析显示,CDSQ-T总分与HAMD、HAMA、SDS、SAS的总分均明显相关(r分别为0.79、0.71、0.76、0.72,P均小于0.05);CDSQ-T总分与HAMD、HAMA、SDS、SAS总分的回归方程中回归系数分别为0.56、0.61、0.91、0.81(P<0.05);CDSQ-T总分与HAMD、HAMA、SDS、SAS总分散点图拟合直线的决定系数R2分别为0.63、0.50、0.57、0.52(P<0.05)。结论 CDSQ-T与HAMD、HAMA、SDS、SAS之间均具有显著的线性相关,尤其是与自评的抑郁量表的一致性最好。Objective To investigate the correlation and consistency of community depression status phone screening questionnaire (CDSQ-T) with HAMD, SDS, HAMA and SAS. Method Four hundred fifty-eight outpatients from department of neurology were recruited into this study. The age of the subjects was 14-86 years. The patients were tested with CDSQ-T, Hamilton depression rating scale (HAMD), Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HAMA), self-rating depression scale (SDS) and self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) by the same psychologist at the same time in our psychological examination department.The scores of the CDSQ-T, HAMD, HAMA, SDS and SAS were compared for correlation and consistency. Pearson correlation coefficient and simple linear regression were adjusted Result Pearson correlation analysis showed that, CDSQ-T total score and HAMD, HAMA, SDS, SAS total score were significantly correlated (r were 0.79,0.71,0.76,0.72, respectively, P less than 0.05) and their corresponding regression coefficients were 0.56, 0.61, 0.91, 0.81, respectively (P 〈 0.05). Their coefficient of determination R2 were 0.63, 0.50, 0.57 and 0.52, respectively (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion CDSQ-T has good linear correlations with the HAMD, HAMA, SDS, SAS, particularly has best consistency with self-rating depression scale.

关 键 词:社区抑郁状态电话筛查问卷 HAMILTON抑郁量表 ZUNG抑郁自评量表 相关性 一致性 

分 类 号:R749.4[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象