《道论》的叙事方式及“客观性”问题  

The Narrative Mode of Doctrine of Dao and the Issue of "Objectivity"

作　　者：陈嘉明[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学人文学院哲学系 [2]厦门大学知识论与认知科学研究中心

出　　处：《哲学分析》2011年第5期13-18,197,共6页Philosophical Analysis

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“‘元哲学’研究”(项目编号:10BZX047);福建省社科规划项目“内在主义与外在主义”(项目编号:2008B061)的阶段性成果;厦门大学“基础创新科研基金”(中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金)资助(项目编号:2011221024)

摘　　要：哲学可以有两类不同的叙事方式,《道论》等三本书大体属于"……是什么"的叙事方式,故在寻找某些问题作为切入点方面,我们似乎还可以有更高的期待。此外,《道论》认为客观性是内在性与外在性的统一,不能放弃或否定"客观性原则"。不过这种统一,应当体现在"理据"之中。如果诉诸"从本体论上"来"担保知识的客观有效性",由于受时间、空间、行为的目的性等因素的制约,在许多情况下是难以做到的。因此把客观性建立在"理据"的基础上,或许是一种更为恰当、合理的解释。There are two different kinds of narrative mode in philosophy.Yang Guorong's The Doctrine of Dao and other two books belong to the mode of 'what is…'.As for the question of how to find some issues as a starting point for research,it seems that we can still have higher expectations.In addition,The Doctrine of Dao takes 'objectivity' as unity of internality and externality and emphasizes that the objectivity principle 'cannot be given up.' However,this unity should be embodied in 'evidence or reason'.If resorting to the guarantee of the objective validity of knowledge 'from ontology side',then due to the restrictions of time and space,teleonomy in behaviors and other factors,it is difficult to be achieved in many cases.Therefore,to put the objectivity on the basis of 'evidence or reason' might be a more appropriate and reasonable explanation.

关 键 词：叙事方式 客观性 理据 

分 类 号：B26[哲学宗教—中国哲学]