检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐美凤[1]
出 处:《情报杂志》2011年第11期134-139,共6页Journal of Intelligence
摘 要:基于问卷调查,结合指标的描述性统计与结构方程模型,对自然科学、人文社科两类学术虚拟社区的知识共享行为影响因素进行对照分析。发现,各影响因素在两类学术社区中发挥着不同的作用。自然科学社区的成员信息性动机较强,而人文社科社区成员的参与则更多出于心理性动机;成员间的信任对两类社区的知识共享行为均有显著的正的影响,同时,自然科学社区成员更重视社区管理的有效性;两类社区中,成员的身份特征对浏览行为有积极影响,而自我效能对发帖行为有积极的正的影响;对于积分、等级、荣誉称号三种常用的激励形式,自然科学社区成员更认同前两者,人文社科社区的成员则更认同后两者。基于此,对不同学科领域学术社区的管理提出了建议。Based on the questionnaire survey, the influencing factors of knowledge sharing behavior in academic virtual communities of different discipline are analyzed comparably through the descriptive statistical analysis and strnctural equation model of the observational indices in this paper. The result shows that the factors play different roles in the knowledge sharing behavior in the two types of academic virtual communities. Natural science community members have much stronger information motives, while humanities and social science community members are more out of psychogenic motive. In both types of communities, identity of members has a positive impact on the browsing behavior, and self-efficacy has a positive impact on posting behavior. In both types of communities, the trust between members significantly affects the knowledge sharing behavior. Meanwhile, natural science community members attach more importance to effective and reasonable community management, of the three common incentive forms: member points, level and honor, science community members attach more importance to the former two, while humanities and social science community members pay more attention to the latter two. Based on this, the management of different discipline academic communities is proposed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15