检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京大学城市与环境学院资源与环境地理系,地表过程与模拟教育部重点实验室,北京100871 [2]北京大学深圳研究生院,城市人居环境科学与技术重点实验室,深圳518055
出 处:《北京大学学报(自然科学版)》2011年第6期1089-1096,共8页Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis
基 金:国家自然科学基金(40971052)资助
摘 要:以我国1996,2000,2004,2008年各省区为例,分别采用传统生态足迹模型及基于能值改进生态足迹模型,从全国、地区、省区内3个层面,利用Theil系数进行区域可持续性及东、中、西部地区时空差异判定。结果表明:改进模型计算结果绝对数值明显高于传统模型,总体人均生态足迹、生态承载力及生态盈余与赤字区域排列均为东部>中部>西部。东、中、西部地区区内及区际差异结果分解表明:我国生态足迹、生态承载力省、区间的差异主要由区域内部省间差异导致;东、中、西地区尺度上,三者间差异并非构成我国区域差异的主体,区间差异基本保持稳定;区内尺度上,除西部地区外,东、中部地区差异略有下降,而西部地区异质性减少明显。By using a modified emergy-based ecological footprint model and Theil index, the authors accounted and analyzed the changing process of the per capita consumption ecological footprint and local output ecological carrying capacity in China in 1996, 2000, 2004 and 2008. The results show that the absolute value of the improved model results was significantly higher than the traditional model. Overall per capita ecological footprint, ecological carrying capacity and ecological surplus and deficit were higher in east region than in middle and west regions. Analysis of the Theil index show that during 1996 and 2008 the main differences between the regions were caused by the differences within intra region rather than the inter-region. At the regional level, differences among the three regions remained stable; at provincial level, difference slightly decreased in east and middle regions, while the west rezion decreased significantly.
分 类 号:X22[环境科学与工程—环境科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.74