检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学管理学院,湖北武汉430074 [2]中南民族大学法学院,湖北武汉430074
出 处:《科研管理》2011年第11期63-70,共8页Science Research Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金重点项目"促进我国自主创新的知识产权管理研究"(70633003;2007-01~2010-12)
摘 要:专利联营许可是专利联营的核心问题,专利联营各类许可过程实质是许可双方之间的博弈过程,博弈结果为是否签订许可契约。本文基于博弈模型,分别从两个侧面探讨专利联营各类许可行为的内在机理,认为无论哪一类许可,博弈双方之间均为竞合关系,其焦点是如何最大化各自利润。只有双方都达到利润预期,才能出现博弈均衡。在此基础上,为我国企业正确对待专利联营许可提供启示。As the core problem of patent pools, patent licensing of all kinds is the gaming process between the two parties in essence with the result is weather for not the contract for licensing is signed. Based on game models, the inner mechanism of patent pool licensing behavior is discussed from two aspects. Regardless of the kind of patent licensing, the relationship between the two parties is both competition and cooperation with the aim at maximizing their own profits. Only when the two parties gain their expected profits, then a gaming balance appears. In view of this, some enlightenment for Chinese enterprises on how to treat patent pool licensing correctly and appropriately are provided.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.71