检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁立[1]
机构地区:[1]东南大学法学院
出 处:《环球法律评论》2011年第6期8-18,共11页Global Law Review
摘 要:在我国,二元的、倾斜性理论与制度设计无法真正保障劳动权。从理论基础看,社会分层、追求实质正义、二元经济结构、二元劳动力市场并不必然导致二元的、倾斜性法律保护。已有的倾斜性法律保护理论与制度产生了诸多问题,如重新陷入"身份"陷阱、诱发道德风险、提高社会成本、激化社会矛盾、损害资方利益、影响经济发展进程。而劳动权保障的理想出路是剔除二元、倾斜的保护思路,实行平等的、一元的法律保护机制,在理论层面,构建从身份到契约到权利、提高劳资双方合作协调能力,建立和谐劳动关系的理论。在制度层面,强化国家保护劳动权的能力,界定国家对劳动权干预的边界,建立一元化的就业制度和一元化的社会保障制度。In China, our dual system and preferential treatment theory cannot protect labor right effectively. Theoretically, social stratification, pursuit of substantive justice, dual economic structure and labor market do not necessarily give rise to dual and preferential legal protection. Our existing legal protection theory based on preferential treatment and system have resulted in a number of problems, such as falling again into the "identity" trap, inducing moral risk, increasing social cost, intensifying social contradictions, infringing upon interests of employers and holding up economic development. The idealistic way to protect labor right should rely on the abolishment of protection based on dual and preferential treatment and implementation of an equal and unified legal mechanism. At theoretical level, efforts should be made to work out the theory covering from identity to contract to right, to improve cooperation and coordination between labor and capital and to establish a harmonious work relation. At institutional level, efforts should be made to strengthen the state' s ability for protection of labor right, to define the boundary of intervene by public power and to establish unified employment and social security systems.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.67.245