涉港民事管辖权冲突解决机制的重构  

Remedies for Jurisdictional Conflict on Civil Matters between Mainland and Hongkong

作　　者：张淑钿[1] 

机构地区：[1]深圳大学法学院,广东深圳518060

出　　处：《法学论坛》2011年第6期145-152,共8页Legal Forum

基　　金：广东省哲学社会科学规划项目<内地与香港民事管辖权的冲突与协调>(07YG04)的部分成果

摘　　要：涉港民事案件地域管辖权冲突源于管辖根据的差异,特别管辖权和裁量管辖权冲突源于过度管辖;专属管辖权冲突体现为内地专属管辖权与香港其他管辖权冲突,协议管辖权冲突主要是因为适用条件和效力认定不同引起。两地立法对管辖权冲突持宽松态度,司法实践中除都采用不方便法院原则外,还各自运用先受理法院和禁诉令。涉港民事管辖权冲突的解决应该针对不同类型的管辖权冲突形态灵活采取多种解决机制,可构建为专属管辖权和协议管辖权优先,以先受理法院为主,不方便法院为例外的多层次机制。Different jurisdiction connect results conlifct of territorial jurisdiction and conflict between special jurisdiction and extra-territorial jurisdicion. Exclusive jurisdiction of mainland＇ s court will conflict with any other types jurisdiction of Hongkong＇ court. Different conditions and effect of jurisdiction by agreement between Mainland and Hongkong. Forum Non Conveniens as an common remedy and First - Seised Cout in Mainland＇ court and Antisuit Injunction in Hongkong＇ court as particular approaches for jurisdiction conflict in law and court＇ practice including. The jurisdiction conflict of civil matters between Mainland and Hongkong shows different type. Within current practice, up to four remedies for jurisdiction conflict may be available ： priority of exclusive jurisdiction and jurisdiction by agreement, First - seised ourt and Forum Non Convenience as an exception.

关 键 词：管辖权冲突 专属管辖权 协议管辖权 先受理法院 不方便法院 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]