检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李芳[1]
机构地区:[1]大连大学附属中山医院口腔科,辽宁大连116001
出 处:《中国实用口腔科杂志》2008年第10期617-618,共2页Chinese Journal of Practical Stomatology
摘 要:目的对比观察可乐丽菲露SEBOND自酸蚀黏结剂和75%氟化钠甘油糊剂治疗牙本质过敏症的临床疗效。方法2007年7月至2008年5月在大连大学附属中山医院口腔科就诊的面牙本质过敏症患者112例,共196颗患牙,随机分为治疗组56例103颗患牙,用可乐丽菲露SEBOND自酸蚀黏结剂脱敏治疗;对照组56例93颗患牙,用75%氟化钠甘油糊剂脱敏治疗,在统一标准下进行即刻和3个月后的疗效对照分析。结果两组之间即刻疗效差异无统计学意义,3个月后的疗效差异具有统计学意义,可乐丽菲露SEBOND自酸蚀黏结剂脱敏效果明显优于氟化钠甘油糊剂。结论可乐丽菲露SEBOND自酸蚀黏结剂对牙本质过敏症具有较好的临床治疗效果。Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of CLEAFIL TM SE BOND and that of 75% sodium fluoride glycerin paste for dentine hypersensitivity.Methods In 112 patients diagnosed as occlusal dentine hypersensitivity,196 teeth were randomly divided into two groups.The test group including 56 cases(103 teeth)was treated using CLEAFIL TM SE BOND.The control group including 56 cases(93 teeth)was treated by 75% sodium fluoride glycerin.Instant and 3 months’postoperative efficacy was compared in the same standard.Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in instant efficacy,but there was significant difference in 3 months.Efficacy of CLEAFIL TM SEB OND was obviously better than sodium fluoride glycerin paste.Conclusion CLEAFIL TM SE BOND has good clinicale fficacy for dentine hypersensitivity.
关 键 词:可乐丽菲露SEBOND 自酸蚀粘接剂 牙本质过敏症
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80