美国辩诉交易制度的争论  

Controversy over the Plea Agreement System in the USA

作　　者：李勇[1] 

机构地区：[1]最高人民检察院理论所

出　　处：《北方法学》2008年第4期40-47,共8页Northern Legal Science

基　　金：福特基金会关于认罪程序课题(1075-0191-0)的阶段性成果之一

摘　　要：美国辩诉交易制度作为实践性很强的刑事诉讼制度,自产生以来就备受争议。对辩诉交易最有分量的批评集中在对这一制度是否违反宪法和社会正义体系上,伴随着这些批评,辩诉交易制度不断吸纳其中的合理成分,充实和完善自己。研究辩诉交易的争论,可以看到辩诉交易制度不断自我完善的轨迹。美国辩诉交易制度的争论对于我国能否引入这一制度也有重要的参考意义。As a practical criminal proceedings system,the plea agreement system has aroused considerable controversy when introduced in America.This system has been bitterly criticized for it is unconstitutional and against the social justice.Learning from these lessons,the plea agreement system has been constantly developed and perfected,which is of great value to study on the controversy in order to be taken as reference in our nation for the system introduction.

关 键 词：辩诉交易 宪法权利 正义 刑事诉讼 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]