检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京军区南京总医院神经内科脑电图室
出 处:《医学研究生学报》1998年第1期20-22,共3页Journal of Medical Postgraduates
摘 要:目的:对癫痫患者行手术前脑电图描记,以观察其对致痫灶的定位价值。方法:对17例癫痫患者采用硬膜下及深部埋藏电极检查,并且与常规头皮电极EEG及手术中ECoG、DEEG进行比较。结果:在尖棘波的检出率上,三者阳性率比较无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但在致痫灶的定位率上,颅内埋藏电极EEG准确率达88.2%,明显高于头皮电极EEG(P<0.01);与术中ECoG、DEEG比较无明显差异(P>0.05),提示具有相似的定位价值。Objectives: The value of localization of epileptogenic fuci was observed in epileptic patients preoperatively by implanted electrods in subdural and brain depth. Methods: The changes in the implanted electrodes in 17 patients with epilepty were compared with EEG recorded by scalp electrodes, and ECoG、DEEG in operation. Results: There was no significant difference among those methods in recorded spike discharge rate ( P >0.05), but in location of epileptogenic fuci,the accurate rate of preoperative ECoG was 88.2%, which was similar to that of intraoperative ECoG ( P >0.05) and much superior to that of EEG ( P <0.01). Conclusions:Those date indicate that ECoG recorded by implanted subdural and depth electrodes preoperatively is a better way for locating epileptogenic fuci.
分 类 号:R742.1[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31