检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗广裕[1] 徐国良[1] 李茵[1] 单宏波[1] 高晓燕[1] 林世永[1] 贺龙君[1]
机构地区:[1]中山大学肿瘤防治中心内镜激光科华南肿瘤学国家重点实验室,广州市510060
出 处:《中国肿瘤临床》2011年第21期1338-1341,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
摘 要:目的:评价实时超声支气管镜引导下的经支气管针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)对肺癌的诊断价值。方法:回顾分析中山大学肿瘤防治中心2010年8月至2011年2月期间,46例经胸部CT或PET-CT检查显示为纵隔和/或肺门淋巴结肿大和/或胸内气管旁肿块(≥1 cm)的患者行EBUS-TBNA的资料(其中临床拟诊为肺癌并肺门和/或纵隔淋巴结转移25例,纵隔和/或肺门不明原因淋巴结肿大21例),统计实时EBUS-TBNA在肺癌诊断中的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及诊断率。结果:46例患者中,其中经病理学检查确诊为肺癌患者38例,淋巴结结核3例,淋巴结炎3例,结节病1例,淋巴瘤1例。46例患者中,经EBUS-TBNA诊断为肺癌34例,淋巴结核2例,淋巴结炎3例,结节病1例。38例肺癌患者共穿刺48组淋巴结,1例气管旁肿物,其中经EBUS-TBNA诊断为肺癌34例,假阴性4例,敏感性为89.5%,特异性为100%,阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为66.7%,诊断率为87.0%。EBUS-TBNA过程安全,全部病例无严重并发症发生,仅1例一过性发热。结论:实时EBUS-TBNA,并发症少,可在门诊进行,且诊断率、敏感性及阴性预测值高,是诊断肺癌安全、有效的方法。当常规支气管镜未能取到阳性病理结果时,亦可尝试通过对肺门或纵隔淋巴结或肺内肿块行EBUS-TBNA来诊断。Objective: To evaluate the role of real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration ( EBUS-TBNA ) in the diagnosis of lung cancer. Methods: A total of 46 patients with mediastinal, and/or hilar lymphadenopathy, and/or intrathoracic peritracheal masses ( ≥ 1 cm ) previously detected by CT or PET-CT scan and who underwent EBUS-TBNA between August 2010 and February 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-five cases were diagnosed as lung cancer with hilar and/or mediastinal lymph node metastasis, and 21 cases were unknown mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnosis rate of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of lung cancer were calculated. Results: Among the 46 patients, pathological examination diagnosed 38 cases of lung cancer, 3 of lymphatic tuberculosis, 3 of lymphadenitis, 1 of sarcoidosis, and 1 of lymphoma. EBUS-TBNA diagnosed 34 cases of lung cancer, 2 of lymphatic tuberculosis, 3 of lymphadenitis, and 1 of sarcoidosis. In 38 lung cancer cases, 48 samples were obtained from lymph nodes, and 1 sample was obtained from an intrapul- monary lesion. A total of 34 cases were diagnosed by EBUS-TBNA, and false negatives were obtained in 4 cases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnosis rate were 89.5%, 100%, 100%, 66.7%, and 87%, respectively. The procedure was safe and no severe complication occurred. Conclusion: The diagnosis rate, sensitivity, and negative predictive value of EBUS-TBNA are high. Therefore, EBUS-TBNA may be a safe and effective technique in the diagnosis of lung cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.143.5.121