民国北京政府立宪进程中关于行政诉讼模式的争论  

Dispute of Administrative Litigation Model in Constitutionalism Process of Beijing Government of the Republic of China

作　　者：王学辉[1] 赵勇[2,3] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学行政法学院 [2]乐山师范学院政法系 [3]西南政法大学

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2011年第4期25-34,138,共11页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

摘　　要：清末预备立宪官制改革中首先提出了行政裁判院的设想,并提出了《行政裁判院官制草案》,后又起草了《行政审判院法》,①但最终因辛亥革命的爆发未能颁布。民国之后,尽管1912年《中华民国临时约法》中规定了以平政院作为审理行政案件的机关,但对于行政裁判模式究竟应采特别模式还是普通模式一直存在着争议,且论争贯穿于整个北京政府立宪过程之中。The design of the administrative tribunal was first proposed in the bureaucracy reformation of the Preparation for Constitutionalism in the late Qing Dynasty, and then in the Administrative Tribunal Bureaucracy Draft and the Administrative Trial Act, which ultimately did not have time to be enacted due to the outbreak of the Revolution of 1911. After the Republic, although the administrative judgment institute was written down in the 1912 Provisional Constitution of the Republic of China as an special authority to hear administrative cases, whether to take the particular model or normal model for the administrative decision was still left a big controversy throughout the entire Constitutionalism Process of Beijing Government of the Republic of China.

关 键 词：立宪 行政诉讼模式 争论 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学] D929[政治法律—法学]