试论我国行政诉讼的政治功能——基于政治结构维度的比较结论  

On the Political Functions of Administrative Proceedings in our Country ——Comparative Conclusion in term of Political Structure

作　　者：张亮[1] 苏爽[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120

出　　处：《重庆电子工程职业学院学报》2011年第4期60-62,共3页Journal of Chongqing College of Electronic Engineering

基　　金：2010年西南政法大学研究生科研创新计划重点项目研究阶段性成果;编号2010XZYJS166;指导老师:谭宗泽

摘　　要：中国古代虽然不存在现代意义上的行政诉讼,却早已形成了该项法律制度的雏形。彼时今日作为制度工具的行政诉讼功能差异是由政治结构差异所决定的,因而传统意识如今仍能给予经验哺给。同时应当认识到,我国现时运行的行政诉讼同样区别于西方的初始设计,传统意识深刻影响着制度的本土适用。文章基于现代中国的政治结构,提出社会暴力消化、行政引导、正义标准的实践三项行政诉讼功能,试图探寻社会转型中我国行政诉讼应当具备的政治功能。In ancient China, there were not administrative proceedings like today, but the model of this kind of law has been existed. As a tool for disciplines, the differences between the ancient and today＇s administrative proceedings are determined by the political structure. Therefore, the traditional realization still can be, complemented by today＇s experience. At the same time, the present administrative proceedings of our country is also different from the western＇s original design, traditional realization greatly influences the uses of these disciplines. In terms of China＇s political structure, this paper puts forward the administrative functions in three aspects： digestion of social crimes, administrative guidance and practice of justice standards in order to explore what political functions our administrative proceedings should have during our society＇s transitional period.

关 键 词：政治结构 传统意识 行政诉讼 

分 类 号：DF74[政治法律—诉讼法学]