论刑事诉讼的公共治理  

Criminal Procedure on Public Governance

作　　者：张善燚[1] 柳成柱[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南大学法学院,湖南长沙410083

出　　处：《湖南大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第6期128-132,共5页Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：2008年度国家社科基金项目(08BZX062)的成果之一

摘　　要：刑事诉讼的程序与结果之间的非对称性、刑事诉讼程序失灵以及刑事诉讼的公共产品属性是公共治理理论进入刑事诉讼的必要前提。刑事诉讼的公共治理表现出协调性、开放性、合目的性之治理价值取向。刑事诉讼公共治理范畴包括刑事司法权的配置、刑事司法组织的优化、刑事司法参与人的权益最大化以及刑事司法程序的安定性与救济性合一等四个方面,其治理方式包括完善刑事诉讼程序规范和程序政策。The asymmetry between the procedures and results of criminal procedure, the procedure fail ure of criminal procedure, and the public product attribute of criminal procedure are a necessary premise for the public governance to enter into criminal procedure. The public governance of criminal procedure shows its governance value orientation in coordination, openness and purposiveness. The category of crim inal procedure＇s public governance includes four aspects： the configuration of criminal jurisdiction, the op- timization of criminal judicial organizations, the maximization of criminal justice participants＂ rights and in- terests, and the unity of stability and relief of criminal justice and procedure. Its governance mode includes the perfection of the criminal procedure specification and policy.

关 键 词：刑事诉讼 公共治理 治理范畴 程序政策 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]