顶罪替刑犯罪的刑法思考  

Reflections on Pleading Guilty to Crimes Never Committed from the Perspective of Criminal Laws

作　　者：张晶[1] 韩建成[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽大学法学院

出　　处：《安徽大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2011年第6期111-116,共6页Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：安徽省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目(2009sk045);安徽大学"211工程"学术创新团队项目

摘　　要：当今代人顶罪替刑事件频现报端,而我国现行刑法却没有就顶替人犯罪作专门的规定,所以导致顶罪替刑在司法实践中的罪名归属存在争议。为了体现罪刑法定原则,应当将顶罪替刑行为设置为独立的罪名,与现行刑法中窝藏、包庇罪相区别。同时,还需要从犯罪构成要件中分析顶罪替刑罪的基本特征,解决司法实践中本罪的犯罪主体、共同犯罪等复杂问题,以期实现刑法规制的目的。There are precedents who replace other＇s crime or punishment. In the current crimimal law system of mainland area of China, there are no relative clauses concerning those cases. Such circum- stances lead to the existence of disputes how to convict the one who replaces other＇s crime or punishment. In order to reflect principle of legality, we should egislate a special charge for replacing other＇s crime or punishment to distinguish it from the crime of harboring a criminal or the crime of concealing the murder. We analyze the the fundamental characteristics of the crime of replacing other＇s crime or punishment from subjective aspects of a crime. In order to accomplish criminal regulation, we also solve the problems such as the subject of crime, joint crime in judicial practice.

关 键 词：顶罪替刑 窝藏 包庇 期待可能性 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]