检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:欧阳驰[1] 邓华菲[1] 黄轩[1] 陈晓岚[1] 李石旺[1] 刘剑萍[1]
出 处:《中华医学教育探索杂志》2011年第10期1249-1251,共3页Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
基 金:湖南省教育厅科研基金(编号:09C911)
摘 要:目的评估全科医学生对2种组织学实验教学模式的认知满意度。分析两者的优缺点。方法建立网络数据库,设计调查问卷,发放给193名全科医学生。结果75%学生较认同“案例教学编排得很好”;82%学生较认同“所有图像都附有详实的文字说明”。结论学生支持采用网络化实验教学。然而,目前组织学网络化实验教学可能难以完全取代传统显微镜实验教学。Objective To assess the satisfaction of general practical students' perception with the two modes of histologic laboratory instruction, and obtain the advantages and disadvantages of each mode. Methods Web-based database was established and in the questionnaires were delivered to the general practical students ( n=193 ). Results 75% of students agreed that the ease study component of the web- based laboratory instruction was arranged in order. 82% of students identified with the detailed word explanation attached to every image presented. Conclusion Students support the progression of web-based his- tologic laboratory instruction, but it is difficult to replace traditional microscope with web-based database in histologic laboratory instruction.
分 类 号:R33-33[医药卫生—人体生理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249