论检察机关职务犯罪侦查中窃听措施的法律规制  

Legal Regulation of Intercept in the Investigation of Duty Crime

作　　者：韩成军[1] 

机构地区：[1]郑州大学法学院,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2011年第6期173-179,共7页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(11BFX087):"宪法学视野下行政权的检察监督";最高人民检察院检察理论研究重点课题(GJ2010B05):"检察权配置问题研究";河南省政府决策研究招标课题(2011B277):"侦查监督工作机制改革问题研究";河南省软科学研究计划项目(102400420012):"检察权基本理论研究";郑州大学"211工程"三期建设子项目招标课题(LC-B020):"检察权及其配置问题研究"

摘　　要：随着我国加入《联合国反腐败公约》以及我国日益严峻的反腐形势,将窃听等技术侦查手段引入职务犯罪侦查中颇为必要,但是不能因此忽视此种侦查技术对公民隐私权造成的巨大侵害。对此,可以借鉴境外经验,规范我国的职务犯罪窃听措施。两个《规定》对窃听证据审查的规定具有重要的先导意义,需要进一步完善。As China has signed UN Convention against Corruption,and the situation of combating corruption has become more and more rigorous.Therefore,it is necessary to put the measures of technical investigation such as intercept into the investigation of duty crime.However it cannot be ignored that its hurt to the privacy of citizens.It needs us to learn from the experiences of other countries to regulate the measure of intercept in the investigation in China.The two new regulations concerning evidence has been related to the checking on the evidences collected by intercepting,which is of leading importance and needs improving as well.

关 键 词：职务犯罪 侦查 窃听措施 

分 类 号：DF793[政治法律—诉讼法学]