论马克思主义哲学的三种解释范式  

Three Patterns of Interpreting Marxist Philosophy

作　　者：韩桂玲[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]上海财经大学 [2]商丘师范学院教育科学学院

出　　处：《南京师大学报（社会科学版）》2011年第6期15-21,共7页Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：当今学界对马克思的"新唯物论"存在三种解释范式,即将辩证法人为注入旧唯物论中的"自在物质论"的教科书解释范式;否认自然辩证法将物质概念封闭于人类实践之内而无法实现逻辑上自我完成的"实践本体论"解释范式;把人类历史与自然看成在内在相互联系中生成的"实践生成论"解释范式。前两种解释范式其理论缺乏自洽性和指导实践的局限性。只有"实践生成论"的解释范式才洞见到马克思"新唯物论"的思想本质,即它既通过人类实践逻辑地证实自然物质的优先地位,又将历史唯物论作为马克思"新唯物论"的核心,由此必然扩张为辩证唯物论,实现了历史唯物论与辩证唯物论的统一。There are three modes of interpreting the Marxist new materialism： the textbook pattern of integrating the dialectics with the old materialism that is characterized by autonomous hylicism; the pattern of ontological praxis, which denies the dialectics of nature, encloses the concept of matter in practice and thus becomes logically inconsistent; the mode of practice-based genetivism, which advocates that human history and nature are co-emergent in their internal interactions. The first two modes of understanding are logically inconsistent and thus have limitations in guiding the practice. Only the last one can reveal the essence of the Marxist new materialism, which proves the priority of nature through human practice in a logical manner and regards the historical materialism as the soul of the Marxist new materialism. This interpretation will inevitably develop into the dialectical materialism and achieve the unification between the historical materialism and the dialectical materialism.

关 键 词：马克思主义哲学 辩证唯物论 历史唯物论 实践本体论 实践生成论 

分 类 号：B17[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]