检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭成[1]
机构地区:[1]贵州大学法学院,贵阳550025
出 处:《宜宾学院学报》2011年第4期25-29,共5页Journal of Yibin University
摘 要:我国《行政诉讼法》明确规定:人民法院审理行政案件,不适用调解。这一制度设计的初衷是限制行政机关随意处分行政职权。实际上,行政机关在行政诉讼过程中实现调解只是对诉权的处分,而不是对行政职权的处分,又基于有效解决纠纷的现实考量,建立行政诉讼调解制度是必要的;同时,行政诉讼有其自身的特殊性,调解必须在程序和实体上受到严格的规制。China's Administrative Litigation Law stipulates that mediation is not applicable in the handling of administrative cases by the People's Court.The original intention of this institutional design was to restrict the willfulness of administrative organs in the use of their administrative power in the litigation proceedings.In fact,mediation conducted in the process of administrative litigation is aimed at handling the rights of litigants,not accommodating the administrative power.While an institution of mediation in administrative litigation is necessary out of a practical concern over efficiency in the handling of administrative dispute,in view of the specific characteristics of administrative litigation,the practice of mediation must be put under strict supervision both in procedure and in essence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15