检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《宜宾学院学报》2011年第5期14-19,共6页Journal of Yibin University
摘 要:多年以来,由于理工科在现代高等教育体系中占据了主导地位,理工科学术评价机制发展得较为成熟,而哲学社会科学一直以来居于从属地位,因此存在着以理工科学术评价的标准来裁量哲学社会科学学术的现象。要形成与哲学社会科学学术相适应的评价体系,就必须在尊重学科差异性的基础上,建立与完善哲学社会科学学术评价机制,构建多元化哲学社会科学评价主体,完善评价方法,规范评价程序,健全评价规则,促进大学哲学社会科学学术的健康和可持续性发展。For many years,because of the dominance of sciences and technologies in China's higher educational institutions and the consequent maturity of the appraisal mechanism for their achievements,achievements in the field of philosophy and social sciences have been also evaluated by the same appraisal mechanism as the one used for sciences and technologies,which is accountable by the prolonged subordinate status philosophy and social sciences have held in China's structure of higher education.To introduce a proper appraisal mechanism for evaluating achievements in the field of philosophy and social sciences,it is necessary to establish and refine,with a regard for the distinction between difference disciplines,a separate set of criteria for the evaluation of achievements in the field of philosophy and social sciences.That would involve the construction of a separate body of evaluation made up of philosophical and social scholars,a refinement of the means for evaluation,a standardization of the procedure of evaluation,a perfection of the rules of evaluation,with an eye to promoting wholesome and sustainable development of academic studies in the fields of philosophy and social sciences.
分 类 号:G644.4[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.35.244