汉藏—高加索超级语系:斯塔罗斯金的论证  

On Chinese-Caucasian Super Language Family in Terms of Starostin's Hypothesis

作　　者：李艳[1] 李葆嘉[2] 

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学外国语学院,陕西西安710062 [2]南京师范大学文学院,江苏南京210097

出　　处：《陕西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2011年第6期168-174,共7页Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究西部和边疆地区项目(10XJA740002);陕西师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(10SZYB07);陕西师范大学人文社会科学研究基金重点项目(09SZD04);南京师范大学"211工程"三期重点学科建设项目

摘　　要：20世纪80年代,斯塔罗斯金提出独树一帜的"汉藏-高加索超级语系假说",他从词汇、语音、形态三方面分别进行了论证。但论证材料存在一些问题,如一义多形、语义分化松散导致比较空间过大;历史背景未及考虑、文献引用时有失误;对应词项没有严格依据语音对应要求等。与沙加尔的汉藏-南岛语系假说相比,二者在研究方法上存在很大差异。不过,在假说纷纭的历史比较语言学领域,要使其假说得到学界认可一时还难以做到。这并不意味着假说就被否定,因为除了传统假说的影响力之外,新假说的认可需要持久的探索。In the 1980＇s,Starostin contributed his original ＂Hypothesis of Chinese-Caucasian Super Language Family＂ and supported the hypothesis in vocabulary,phonology and morphology.However,there were numerous problems in his supporting materials,for example,a much broader comparative space than necessary caused by polymorphism to one sense and loose semantic divergence,little consideration on historical background,faulty citation of documents,no strict corresponding phonetic requirements to equivalents and whatever.Moreover,compared with Sagart＇s Hypothesis of Chinese-South Island Language Family,the two hypotheses offered great distinctions in research approach.However,since diverse hypotheses often occur in the world of historical comparative linguistics,a hypothesis not widely accepted doesn＇t mean it has been abandoned for a new hypothesis needs prolonged exploration before it is accepted.

关 键 词：历史比较语言学 斯塔罗斯金 汉-高语系假说 

分 类 号：H0-06[语言文字—语言学] H4