序贯疗法与传统三联疗法根治幽门螺旋杆菌疗效比较  

Comparison of the curative effect between sequential therapy and traditional triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori

作　　者：张伟[1] 李晋平[1] 杜滨[1] 

机构地区：[1]绵阳市中心医院干部保健科,四川省绵阳621000

出　　处：《中国基层医药》2011年第24期3352-3353,共2页Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy

摘　　要：目的 探讨序贯疗法与传统三联疗法根治幽门螺旋杆菌（Hp）疗效.方法 回顾性分析Hp阳性患者的临床资料,依据治疗方式不同分为序贯疗法组与传统三联疗法组.比较两组的ITT分析和PP分析结果,疗效以及不良反应发生率.结果 序贯疗法组ITT分析和PP分析结果均高于传统三联疗法组（x2=19.30,11.18,均P＜0.05）；序贯疗法组临床治疗总有效率高于传统三联疗法组（x2=14.25,P＜0.05）；序贯疗法组不良反应发生率均低于传统三联疗法组（x2=10.53,6.93,6.93,均P＜0.05）.结论 序贯疗法根治Hp疗效明显,不良反应少,值得临床推广应用.Objective To explore curative effect of eradication of Helicobacter pylori by sequential therapy and traditional triple therapy.Methods To retrospective analyze clinical data of Helicobacter pylori masccline patients,which were divided into the sequential therapy group and the traditional triple therapy group.Results The results of ITT analyze and PP analyze of the sequential therapy group were higher than those of the traditional triple therapy group （x2 =19.30,11.18,all P 〈 0.05） ;The total effective rate of clinical curing of the sequential therapy group was higher than that of the traditional triple therapy group（ x2 =14.25,P 〈0.05 ） ;The untoward reaction rate of the sequential therapy group was lower than that of the traditional triple therapy group（ x2 =10.53,6.93,6.93,all P 〈0.05 ）.Conclusion The curative effect of eradication of Helicobacter pylori by the sequential therapy were obviously and little untoward reaction rate,which was to be worthy used.

关 键 词：序贯疗法 三联疗法 幽门螺旋杆菌 

分 类 号：R573[医药卫生—消化系统]