检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪海燕[1]
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学
出 处:《中国法学》2011年第6期69-77,共9页China Legal Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金"刑事诉讼制度法律移植"项目;中国政法大学校级人文社会科学研究项目资助
摘 要:就法律层面分析,法律对"律师伪证罪"客观方面描述不清是辩护律师被滥诉的重要原因。但更为关键的是,现行法律体系没有设置合理的程序防止此罪名被曲解、滥用。因此,法律除了要对罪状做精准描述之外,还要构建一个公正的程序防止相关罪名成为职业报复的工具。就此而言,《刑法》不应单列"律师伪证罪",《刑事诉讼法》也没有必要单列条文强调辩护人不得伪证的义务。《刑事诉讼法修正案(草案)》虽然对相关条文作了修改,但仍需完善。From a legal perspective,ambiguous legal description on objective aspects of the 'Perjury Committed by Lawyers' is the main reason leading the fact that defense lawyers are abusively accused.Nevertheless,the more important reason is that the existing legal system has not set up such reasonable procedure to prevent the crime from being misunderstood and abused.Therefore,besides precisely description on facts about the crime,just procedure should be constructed to prevent relevant crimes from being a tool for occupation revenge.In this regard,the Criminal Law should not individually list the 'Perjury Committed by Lawyers',and the Criminal Procedure Law does not necessarily make a provision emphasizing the obligation of a defender not to perjure.Although the Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Law (Draft) have revised some relevant provisions,further improvement is still needed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.79