检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨斌让[1] 陈小文[1] 张民[1] 彭刚[1] 张琳琳[1]
出 处:《中国儿童保健杂志》2011年第12期1084-1087,1102,共5页Chinese Journal of Child Health Care
基 金:广东省医学科研基金(A209612);深圳市科技计划项目(200902108)
摘 要:【目的】探讨注意缺陷多动障碍(attention deficit hyperactivity disorder,ADHD)混合型(ADHD-CT)及注意缺陷为主型(ADHD-IT)的男童执行功能特征。【方法】采用抑制(反应/不反应任务、停止信号任务、Stroop色-字任务)及工作记忆功能任务(顺背数字、倒背数字、Corsi木块回忆、n-Back)对76名ADHD-CT、15名ADHD-IT及15名对照组男童进行测试。【结果】1)ADHD组儿童在反应/不反应任务、Stroop色-字任务、倒背数字、Corsi木块回忆任务上的表现明显差于对照组儿童,控制年龄、年级、总智商后比较差异有统计学意义。2)ADHD-CT与ADHD-IT组儿童在各测试任务上的表现差异无统计学意义。【结论】ADHD儿童存在执行功能损伤。ADHD-CT与ADHD-IT亚型执行功能损伤模式相同。[Objective] To explore the characteristics of executive function in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, predominantly inattentive subtype (ADHD-IT) and ADHD combined subtype (ADHD). [Method] Seventy-six boys with ADHD-CT, 15 boys with ADHD-IT and 54 healthy control subjects performed inhibition functions (Go/m) go task, Stroop color-word test,stop signal task) and working memory functions (digits forward, digits backward, Corsi block recall and visual spatial n-back). [Results] 1) ADHD groups performed significantly worse than healthy controls did in Go/nogo task, Stroop color-word test, digits backward, and Corsi block recall. After controlling for age, grade and full-scale in telligence quotient (FIQ), the results remained unehanged. 2)There were no significant differences in all tasks between ADHD-CT and ADHD-IT subtypes. [Conclusion] The results suggest that boys with ADHD showed deficit in executive function. The pattern of deficit in executive function between ADHD-CT and ADHD-IT subtypes is similar to each other.
分 类 号:R749.94[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249