金融犯罪新罪名司法适用的实证分析与理性反思  

New Financial Crime Charges Empirical Analysis of the Judicial Application with Rational Thought

作　　者：彭少辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学研究生教育学院,中国上海200042

出　　处：《上海商学院学报》2011年第4期11-15,共5页Business Economic Review

基　　金：华东政法大学研究生创新能力培养专项资金项目"金融领域犯罪新问题实证研究--以上海国际金融中心建设为背景"项目编号:103092;2010年度国家社科基金项目"近年金融领域刑事司法状态的实证研究"

摘　　要：近年来,金融刑事立法活动呈十分积极的态势,而与之形成鲜明对比的是,司法实务部门对金融犯罪新罪名的适用却相当谨慎。这种现象的原因主要有:刑事立法与司法错位,导致法律虚置现象;犯罪构成要件不甚明确,立法技术有待提高;刑事政策宽容,司法非犯罪化;金融刑事司法人员专业素质的局限性等等。推进金融刑事司法工作,保障金融市场健康发展需要做到:协调金融刑事立法与司法,注重立法效绩,加强司法人员专业素质培养,坚持宽严相济的刑事司法政策,探索金融刑事司法制度创新。In recent years, while criminal legislation of financial activities is very positive, the judiciary on the new charges applicable to financial crime is, in contrast, overcautious. Reasons to account for this phenomenon include discrepancy between legislation and judicature which lead to idle law, lack of clarity with major components of a crime, inadequate legislative technique, over-tolerant criminal judicial policy, and low professional quality of judicial personnel. To promote financial justice and to protect the healthy development of the financial markets, we need to coordinate financial criminal legislation and to focus on effects of legislation. We also need to strengthen training to improve the professional quality of judicial personnel and to innovate the financial criminal justice system.

关 键 词：金融犯罪 新罪名 刑事司法 实证分析 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]