欧阳修《诗本义》与《易童子问》经学阐释比较  

Similarities and differences of interpretation of Ouyang Xiu's Yi Tong Zi Wen and Shi Ben Yi

作　　者：程刚[1] 

机构地区：[1]暨南大学中文系,广东广州510632

出　　处：《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第6期66-71,共6页Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences

基　　金：第四十九批中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目"宋代易学与宋代文学"(20110490917)

摘　　要：《诗本义》与《易童子问》是欧阳修经学的代表作,他在这两部著作中的经学阐释同中有异。从阐释目的来说,欧阳修主张抓住"大本",但具体在《诗本义》与《易童子问》中,"大本"的含义存在差异。欧阳修的经学以"人情"为其阐释根据,但对于"情"的理解在此二书中也存在差异。欧阳修常将经学著作看成一个自足的文本,从文本的文意、文理、文风等角度去判断其真伪,表达自己的理解。对于《周易》文本,他常从其文本的合逻辑性出发,而《诗经》研究中他主要从文学性与逻辑性两个角度去考察。他的经学阐释没有采用逐字逐句的解释经文的模式,而是运用了一种论辩、答问的方式展开。Ouyang Xiu is an important scholar in Song dynasty,Yi Tong Zi Wen and Shi Ben Yi are the representative of his academic works.In these works,Ouyang Xiu use different methods of interpretation because of the differences in text.For the interpretation purposes,Ouyang Xiu grasped the fundamental ideas in the interpretation of two books,Ouyang Xiu took ＂feelings＂ as the basis,but the meaning of feelings was different.Ouyang Xiu considered ＂ZhouYi＂ ＂The Book of Songs＂ as a self-contained text,from the text of the context,liberal arts,style,etc.pointed doubts of the authenticity,and determined the pros and cons of the explain to express his own understanding.

关 键 词：《诗本义》 《易童子问》 欧阳修 经学阐释 

分 类 号：B244[哲学宗教—中国哲学]