134例急腹症患者的影像学诊断技术比较研究  

Comparative Study of Diagnostic Imaging Technology in Patients with Acute Abdomen

作　　者：潘青华[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京医科大学附属无锡人民医院医学影像科,无锡214023

出　　处：《影像技术》2011年第6期17-18,共2页Image Technology

摘　　要：目的:合理选用不同的影像学诊断技术,探讨不同影像学检查方法在急腹症诊断中的应用价值,为临床实践中影像学检查的选择提供依据。方法:选取3年多以来因急腹症就诊于我院的80例患者的影像学资料进行回顾性分析。结果:本组80例患者中,52例患者接受X线检查,35例患者接受CT检查,48例患者接受B超检查;检查结果有肠梗阻23例、尿路结石17例、胆道感染及胆石症11例、急性阑尾炎8例、消化道穿孔6例、急性胰腺炎5例、异位妊娠7例、脏器外伤破裂3例;仅1例患者诊断时出现误诊,其余均诊断正确。结论:X线、B超及CT检查在急腹症的治疗中均具良好的应用价值,分别是于不同类型急腹症的辅助诊断,应熟练掌握各种影像学检查方法的优缺点,以便为患者选择适合的检查方法,提高诊断正确率。Objective： Rational use of different diagnostic imaging techniques to explore different methods of imaging in the diagnosis of acute abdomen in the value of clinical practice, imaging studies provide the basis for selection. Methods： More than three years due to acute abdomen treatment in hospital for 80 patients with imaging data were analyzed retrospectively. Results： 80 patients of 52 patients underwent X-ray examination, 35 patients underwent CT examination, 48 patients received B- ultrasound; inspection results have intestinal obstruction in 23 cases, urinary tract stones in 17 cases, biliary tract infection and cholelithiasis 11 cases, eight cases of acute appendicitis, gastrointestinal perforation in 6 cases, acute pancreatitis, 5 cases of ectopic pregnancy in 7 cases, organ trauma rupture in 3 cases; Only one case of misdiagnosis when patients with the diagnosis, the rest were diagnosed correctly. Conclusion： X-ray, B-ultrasound and CT in the treatment of acute abdomen are a good value, respectively, in the acute abdomen in the diagnosis of different types should be familiar with a variety of advantages and disadvantages of imaging methods in order to for patients to choose the inspection methods to improve diagnostic accuracy.

关 键 词：急腹症 影像学检查 比较 

分 类 号：R574[医药卫生—消化系统]