检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120
出 处:《河北法学》2012年第1期11-18,共8页Hebei Law Science
基 金:西南政法大学青年项目<新闻媒体侵犯人身权研究>(09XZ-QN-14)的研究成果;重庆市社会科学规划项目<法治新闻的法治化架构>(2010YBZH57)的阶段性研究成果之一
摘 要:钓鱼报道以其揭露黑幕的便捷而受一些新闻媒体推崇,发展势头方兴未艾,其弊端易被忽略。故从新闻传播学理论与法学理论两方面,以真实性与合法性为逻辑主线,深入分析钓鱼报道的弊端及消弭弊端的基本策略,主张钓鱼报道应以浅层诱惑的钓鱼报道为限、新闻媒体不应对被报道对象施加超出多数民众自制力的深层诱惑以致诱发被报道对象违反道德或法律的意图。Fishing reports have been used widely by some news media because of its convenience of exposing shady. At the same time, its drawbacks have been overlooked easily. This paper analyzes the drawbacks of fishing reports and how to eliminate them according to the theory of news and law. During the course of analysis ,the factuality and legitimacy is the main line of this paper. At last, we maintain that fishing reports should be limited to shallow lure and news media shouldn't apply deep lure to the interviewee because deep lure is easy to make them a breach of ethics or the law's intent.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.220.216.164