检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]电子科技大学经济与管理学院,四川成都610054
出 处:《系统工程学报》2011年第6期768-775,共8页Journal of Systems Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70703002)
摘 要:通过建立无做市商情况下的可撤销订单且随机结束的开放式集合竞价模型来分析开放式集合竞价中的价格操纵问题,分别得到了竞争性交易者和价格操纵者的均衡交易策略以及可能存在的操纵行为.研究结果表明,在无做市商情况下,可撤销订单且随机结束的机制不能防止价格操纵的行为,但是随着虚拟交易的进行,价格被操纵的程度和可能性越来越小.总体来看,无做市商情况下的可撤销订单且随机结束模式的开放式集合竞价虽然不能完全消除价格操纵行为,但可以最大限度地抑制价格操纵,优于存在做市商的情况.This paper establishes an open call auction model with order cancellation and random end without market maker to analyze the price manipulation, and obtains the equilibrium trading strategies of competitive trader and price manipulators as well as the possible manipulation behaviour. The results show that under no market maker, the mechanism of order cancellation and random end can not eliminate the price manipulation. However, with the increase of virtual transactions, both the degree and the possibility of price manipulation will become smaller. Overall, the open call auction with order cancellation and random end without market maker may not completely eliminate price manipulation, but it can restrain the price manipulation largely, which means it is better than the situation with market maker.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.128.78.139