不同种植模式咖啡生长特性与经济效益比较  

Comparison on Growth Characteristics and Economic Benefits of Coffee under Different Planting Types

作　　者：董云萍[1,2,3] 黎秀元[1] 闫林[1,2,3] 孙燕[1,2,3] 黄丽芳[1,2,3] 王晓阳[1,2,3] 陈鹏[1,2,3] 

机构地区：[1]中国热带农业科学院香料饮料研究所,海南万宁571533 [2]农业部香辛饮料作物遗传资源利用重点实验室,海南万宁571533 [3]海南省热带香辛饮料作物遗传改良与品质调控重点实验室,海南万宁571533

出　　处：《热带农业科学》2011年第12期12-15,32,共5页Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture

基　　金：农业行业科研专项"热带特色香辛饮料作物产业技术研究与示范"(No.200903024);农业部热作农技推广与体系建设项目(No.11RZNJ-23)

摘　　要：为探讨海南咖啡生产适宜的栽培模式,分析比较了咖啡单作和咖啡香蕉间作2种栽培模式下咖啡的生长量、产量、光合特性及经济效益情况。结果表明:2种栽培模式下咖啡生长量、产量、净光合速率差异均不显著;咖啡香蕉间作比咖啡单作模式下叶面积、叶绿素SPAD值大,但差异未达到显著;咖啡香蕉间作模式下4年单位面积总投入比咖啡单作高58.5%,总收益率比咖啡单作高60.7%。咖啡香蕉间作模式在缩短投资回收期、提高产值、增加收益方面显著高于咖啡单作。Experiments were carried out on coffee monoculture and coffee-banana intercropping to exploring suitable cultivation modes in Hainan Province. Compared growth, yield, photosynthetic characteristics and economic benefit of coffee in this two planting types. The results indicate growth, yield and net photosynthetic rate are no obvious difference. In coffee-banana interplanting, there was larger leaf area and larger chlorophyll spad, the cost per mu was 58.5% higher, the economic benefit per mu was 60.7% higher than coffee monoculture. Investment reclaim cycle can be shortened, productive value improved and income increased when compared with coffee monoculture.

关 键 词：咖啡 种植模式 生长特性 经济效益 

分 类 号：S571.2[农业科学—作物学]