防范科研不端行为的制度借鉴与比较  

A Comparative Study of Western and Chinese Precaution of Dishonesty in Scientific Research and the Enlightenment

作　　者：张效英[1] 李强[2] 姚跃传[3] 陈卫平[4] 

机构地区：[1]合肥工业大学党政办公室,合肥230009 [2]合肥工业大学外国语学院,合肥230009 [3]合肥工业大学党委统战部,合肥230009 [4]合肥工业大学纪委监察处,合肥230009

出　　处：《合肥工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第6期51-56,共6页Journal of Hefei University of Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：2010年度安徽省软科学研究计划项目(10030503010)

摘　　要：近些年来,科研不端现象呈现出新的发展趋势,科研活动中的行为规范问题日益显现出其重要性。西方发达国家在科研不端行为的界定、认定、防范与治理等方面进行了大量的研究与实践,并且从法规及制度上不断地完善对科研不端行为的约束,积累了较为丰富的经验。这些有益经验对于加强我国学术道德建设,建立适合我国国情的科研活动管理规范体系具有重要的借鉴意义。In recent years,the increasing spread of dishonesty in scientific research has been witnessed,making the issue of setting code of conduct highly urgent.In western countries,the studies on dishonesty in scientific research have been conducted in the aspects of definition,affirmation,precaution and solution to enhance the sanctioning effect through legislation-drafting and regulation improvement.These rich experience is valuable for us to develop the scientific ethic and establish the management system of scientific research with Chinese characteristics.

关 键 词：科研不端 界定 制度 措施 启示 

分 类 号：G3[文化科学]