北京市门头沟区石灰窑遗址及公路边坡裸露地表植被修复模式的生态评价  

Ecological Evaluation on Vegetation Restoration in Bare Lands of Limekiln Site and Road Slope in Mentougou District of Beijing

作　　者：苗保河 郑延海[3] 伏芳 孙楠 张文波 卢欣艳 吴晶 苏本营[3] 李永庚[3] 

机构地区：[1]北京山地生态科技研究所,北京102300 [2]北京市门头沟区科技开发实验基地,北京102300 [3]中国科学院植物研究所,北京100093

出　　处：《水土保持研究》2011年第6期125-128,共4页Research of Soil and Water Conservation

基　　金：北京市科技计划项目"门头沟生态修复产业化涵养发展研究与示范工程"(Z090006040310001)

摘　　要：研究对北京市门头沟区石灰窑废弃地及公路边坡裸露地表8种生态修复模式中的植被生态学特征及生态恢复效果进行了调查评价。结果表明:石灰窑遗址人工景观再建模式、框格+植被模式及无土碎石挡土墙灌浆模式修复效果较好,容器苗修复模式和挂网喷播模式效果最差。8种生态修复模式中,植被物种丰富度以客土移栽模式最高(29±1.15),石灰窑人工景观再建模式次之(23.6±2.02),保育棒模式最低(7±1.1);植被盖度以石灰窑人工景观再建模式(88.3%)和框格+植被模式(87%)最高,植生袋模式和挂网喷播模式最低,分别为48%和32%;植被高度以客土移栽模式最高(546.3cm),人工景观模式次之(316cm);挂网喷播和植生袋最低,分别为44.97cm和54.13cm。综合评价结果认为,石灰窑人工景观再建、框格+植被和挡土墙灌浆模式是门头沟区石灰窑及公路边坡裸露地表生态恢复较适合的修复模式。An investigation on evaluating the vegetation restoration effects among 8 different modes（referred as A,B,C,D,E,F,G and H） was conducted in Mentougou District of Beijing.The results showed that D,E and F were much better than the others,A and H were the worst among those modes.Among those 8 vegetation restoration modes,species richness of B was the highest（29±1.15）,with A in the second place（23.6±2.02） and G was the lowest（7±1.1）.Vegetation coverage of E and F was significantly higher than the others（87% and 88.3%,respectively）,but that of A and C was much lower than the others（32% and 48%,respectively）.The plant height of B was the highest（546.3 cm）,with F in the second place（316 cm）,A and C were much lower than the others（44.97 cm and 54.13 cm,respectively）.In conclusion,those results suggested that D,E and F were better than the others in vegetation restoration in bare lands of limekiln site and road slope in Mentougou District of Beijing.

关 键 词：门头沟 石灰窑遗址 公路边坡 植被恢复模式 生态评价 

分 类 号：X171.1[环境科学与工程—环境科学] F062.2[经济管理—政治经济学]