检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学金融学院,湖北武汉430073
出 处:《当代财经》2012年第1期33-45,共13页Contemporary Finance and Economics
基 金:教育部人文社会科学青年项目(09YJC790005)
摘 要:在经典的世代交叠动态一般均衡(A-K OLG)模型的基础上,建立了一个由一系列不等式方程组所构成的"跨期动态"模型,反现实地模拟了提高间接税同时降低直接税对我国社会福利、经济效率的影响。与基期相比,减少对资本征税会带来福利增长0.34%(纯经济效率提高0.25%),减少对劳动征税会带来福利增长0.1%(纯经济效率提高0.02%)。该实证结果证明了间接税比直接税更有利于实现经济效率的理论观点。因此,提高直接税的比重是需要以一定的经济效率损失为代价的,实行该项举措应该权衡好各方面利弊、把握好改革时机。Based on a typical dynamic general equilibrium model of overlappmg generations (Auerbrach and Kotlikoff, 1987), this paper establishes an inter-temporal?dynamic model which consists of a series of non-equality equation sets, then counterfactually simulates the dynamic impacts of both raising the indirect tax and lowing the direct tax on the economic efficiency and social welfare in China. Compared with the base period, reducing taxes on capital will bring welfare gains by 0.34% (increasing pure economic efficiency by 0.25%), while reducing the tax on labor will bring welfare growth by 0.1% (increasing pure economic efficiency by 0.02%). The empirical result proves the theory that indirect taxes are better than direct taxes in realizing economic efficiency. Therefore, to increase the proportion of the direct tax is actually at the cost of certain economic efficiency, we have to seize the right time to reform and weigh the pros and cons very carefully when carrying out such measures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15