检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:柴丛娜[1] 张岱尊[2] 肖文林[1] 樊功为[1] 陈立强[1] 孙健[1]
机构地区:[1]青岛大学医学院附属医院口腔外科,山东青岛266003 [2]青岛大学医学院附属医院儿童牙科
出 处:《口腔医学研究》2012年第1期36-38,42,共4页Journal of Oral Science Research
基 金:山东省自然科学基金(项目号:ZR2010HM54);青岛大学医学院附属医院第四届中青年学术骨干基金资助(2008年立项;无项目号)
摘 要:目的:评估唇腭裂患者的龋齿流行情况。方法:使用龋失补(DMF/dmf)指数对6~12岁组、13~18岁组不同唇腭裂类型的286名患者的龋坏进行记录。结果:唇腭裂患者恒牙龋流行随年龄增长而增加(P<0.05)。6~12岁组中51%未患龋,龋均(DMFT)为1.77。13~18岁组中,4%未患龋,DMFT值为6.96。不同类型的唇腭裂患者的DMFT/dmft无统计学意义。结论:年龄是影响唇腭裂患者恒牙龋齿流行的主要因素,而类型并不是主要因素。rAbstract7 Objective: To assess the prevalence of dental caries in children with oral clefts. Methods: 286 children aged 6-to 12 and 13- to 18-years old with different cleft types (CL, CLP, CP) were investigated, using the standard dental indices dmf(t) and DMF(T). Results: In permanent teeth, caries prevalence increased with increas- ing age. 51% of patients at 6-to 12-years old and 4 % of patients at 13-to 18-years old were caries free. The mean DMFT for 6-to 12-years old group was 1.77 and the mean DMFT for 13-to 18-years old group was 6. 96. In permanent teeth and primary teeth, the caries experiences within different cleft types were not statistically significant different between 6-to 12-years old group and 13-to 18-years old group. Conclusion: The age was a major factor, but the cleft types seem to be not an important factor for influencing the prevalence of caries.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.107.255