检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华侨大学经济与金融学院,福建泉州362021
出 处:《中央民族大学学报(自然科学版)》2011年第4期48-55,共8页Journal of Minzu University of China(Natural Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助(No.71040009);教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助(No.NCET-10-0118)
摘 要:构建了随机需求下基于制造商、零售商和第三方物流商(3PL)组成的具有产品再制造功能的闭环供应链定价模型.利用博弈理论分别对模型在集中决策与分散决策情况下进行了分析并结合算例验证得到了结论:集合决策下销售价格低于分散决策,回收价格高于分散决策,销售量大于分散决策,并且前者的系统利润明显大于后者.系统决策下的各项指标均优于分散决策.最后结合机电配件行业为例,进行了实证分析,说明了文中的定价模型的有效性和实用性.This article demonstrates the price decision model with closed-loop that contains the manufacturer, the retailer and the third-part logistic operator under stochastic demand; it has the recycle and remanufacturing function of product. Based on game theory, the model is analyzed under the centralized-decision and the decentralized-decision and comes to an conclusion that all variables under centralized-decision are prior to that of decentralized-decision. The retailer price of the former is less than the latter; the recycle price and the product's quantity are more than the latter. Besides, the profit of the centralized-decision is obviously grater than that of the decentralized-decision. Lastly, the analysis is given in machined and electric parts, which is presented method effective.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222