检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐明敏[1]
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学
出 处:《犯罪研究》2011年第6期28-35,共8页Chinese Criminology Review
摘 要:伴随全球范围内兴起的审视传统刑事司法体制弊端的思潮,作为旨在全面恢复为犯罪所破坏的多方平衡的刑事和解制度,开始逐步进入人们视野。在较好地弥补传统刑事司法体制固有缺陷的同时,它也顺应了保护被害人权益的呼声。"它山之石,可以攻玉",在海外多国早已将这一制度正名、收编,国内不少城市、地区的司法机关也对其试点实践的大背景下,从传统刑事司法体制弊端的角度,借鉴国外实践研究经验,有助于探讨中国适用刑事和解制度的必要性问题。Along with worldwide concern on the rise of victims' rights and review on the defects of traditional criminal justice system, VOR(Victim-Offender-Reconciliation), which is aimed to fully restore the balance destroyed by crime and make up for the inherent shortcomings of traditional criminal justice system, is gradually entering people's perspective. "By other's faults, wise men correct their own ".Under the background that many foreign countries have formally applied the VOR system and the judiciary of many domestic cities and regions put it into practice, this article is aimed to probe into the application of VOR in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171