检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张广智[1] 王文龙[1] 印兴耀[1] 李超[1]
机构地区:[1]中国石油大学(华东)地球资源与信息学院地球物理系,青岛266555
出 处:《地球物理学进展》2011年第5期1696-1707,共12页Progress in Geophysics
基 金:国家油气重大专项(2011ZX05014-001-010HZ);中国石油科技创新基金(2011D-5006-0301);中国石油大学(华东)自主创新科研计划项目(11CX05006A)联合资助;973项目"非均质油气藏地球物理探测的基础研究"(2007CB209605)
摘 要:本文研究了提取角度道集过程中的不同方法对结果的影响,炮检距和入射角之间的转换方法多种多样,需要根据实际资料特征进行合理选取.插值法和菲涅尔带法依然是提取角度道集的基本方略,信噪比高的资料运用插值法可以高精度地还原AVO特性.提取部分叠加道集的方法也有多种,在有噪音的情况下,角度扫描道集上的部分叠加能更加准确得体现AVO信息.In angle gathers extraction, different methods may lead to different results. There are various methods to transform offset to incidence angle, such as the straight ray and Walden formula, among which one need to select according to the property of data being processed. Interpolation and Fresnel Zone remain the basic strategies in the extraction. Interpolation methods, such as spline interpolation, could provide more accurate AVO property for the data with high SNR, but they are very sensitive to noise. Stacking methods are more feasible for noisy seismic data, which are much more applicable for real data processing. Partial stacks can be extracted from different kinds of gathers, however, method based on scan gathers could provide more accurate AVO information when SNR is relatively low.
分 类 号:P631[天文地球—地质矿产勘探]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200