第三方负责回收闭环供应链的回收责任分担策略选择  

CHOICES OF COLLECTING RESPONSIBILITY SHARING STRATEGIES IN THIRD-PARTY COLLECTING CLOSED-LOOP SUPPLY CHAIN

作　　者：聂佳佳[1] 石园[2] 

机构地区：[1]西南交通大学经济管理学院,成都610031 [2]华南理工大学经济与贸易学院,广州510006

出　　处：《系统科学与数学》2011年第11期1550-1563,共14页Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(71090402)重大项目;国家自然科学基金(71101120;71101055)资助项目;教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金(10YJC630183)资助项目;中央高校基本科研业务专项资助(WJYU11BR059;2011ZM0079)资助课题

摘　　要：研究了第三方回收闭环供应链中各成员对不同回收责任分担策略的偏好.首先建立了3个回收责任分担模型,给出了这些模型的最优解.然后,将回收责任分担模型与无回收责任分担模型进行了比较,最后对这4种决策模型进行了比较分析.研究发现,零售商在3种回收责任分担模型中均有动机分担回收责任;当单位再制造节约成本较大时,制造商也有动机分担回收责任,同时,制造商和零售商对这3种分担策略的偏好相同,而且均在零售商分担回收责任策略下其利润最大;第三方和供应链对这3种分担策略的偏好取决于系统参数的大小.The favor of supply chain members in third-party collecting closed-loop supply chain on different collecting responsibility sharing strategies is considered. Three models of collecting responsibility sharing models are developed and the optimal solutions are given. These three models are compared with a no-collecting responsibility sharing model, and then these four models are compared with each other. It follows that the all retailers have intension to share collecting responsibility in the collecting responsibility sharing models and the manufac- turers also have the same if the unit cost saving of remanufacturing is large enough. Meanwhile, the retailers and the manufacturers have the same favor on these three sharing strategies, and have the largest profit in collecting responsibility sharing by the retailer. Moreover, the favor of the third-party and supply chain on these three sharing strategies is dependent on system parameters.

关 键 词：闭环供应链 再制造 第三方回收 回收比例 回收责任分担 

分 类 号：F274[经济管理—企业管理] F224[经济管理—国民经济]