检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海理工大学光电信息与计算机工程学院,上海200093
出 处:《计算机系统应用》2012年第2期42-46,共5页Computer Systems & Applications
基 金:上海市科委基金(09220502700)
摘 要:针对客观数字图像质量评价方法结构相似度(SSIM)算法对严重失真类型的评价值与主观评价(MOS)值之间存在着明显差异的问题,对几种将SSIM算法与人眼视觉系统(HVS)特性相结合的算法基于图像边缘的ESSIM算法、基于空间域频域敏感的HSSIM算法,以及基于信息内容权值的IWSSIM算法进行了比较。从实验数据可知,ESSIM,HSSIM算法的准确性有不同程度的提高,而IWSSIM模型在比较主客观值相关的单调性方面更为稳定。实验结果为今后结构相似度算法的改进提供了依据,指明研究方向。The objective assessment algorithm Structural Similarity(SSIM) of image quality was not consistent with the Mean Opinion Score (MOS) in particular types of distoration, such as seriously blurred type, etc. In this paper, three models Edeg-based SSIM, HVS-based SSIM, and IW-SSIM which had considered the characteristics both of HVS and structural information were compared in evaluating the seriously Gaussian blurred images. The experimental datas showed that, the IW-SSIM's monotony perfomance was more stable than other models in the relationship between the subjective and objective values, as well as the growing accuracy of the ESSIM and HSSIM. These experimental results are benefit for improvingt the SSIM approach.
关 键 词:结构信息 人眼视觉特征 图像质量评价 对比度敏感度特性 互信息量
分 类 号:TP391.41[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42