“和而不同”:中西文化下人际互动和谐相容模型比较  

Harmony but not Sameness:the Interpersonal Harmony Models Stemming from the Confucian Culture

作　　者：赵菊[1] 佐斌[2] 

机构地区：[1]湖北经济学院社会科学系,武汉430205 [2]华中师范大学心理学院,武汉430079

出　　处：《心理学探新》2011年第6期489-493,共5页Psychological Exploration

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目(05JAXLX009);湖北省人文社会科学基金项目阶段成果(2010y069)

摘　　要：孔子提出"君子和而不同,小人同而不和"的和谐伦理观。"和"是中国传统文化的一个核心概念,在中国古代哲学思想中,"同"与"和"是一对相互联系又相互区别的概念。现代心理学从人际理论和社会认知理论都阐述了同与和的关系。人际理论家分别从特质、情境和行为互动层面提出互补匹配与和谐的关系,而社会认知理论家以自我和他人相似特质为起点,建构了以感知水平和情感为中介的相似性和谐模式。本文结合以往实证研究结果,提出了中国传统文化下,"和而不同"的思想贯穿于整个人际互动的过程中,同时关系层面是影响互动双方评价互动和谐的一个重要因素。Confucius propose ＂Gentlemen are harmonious arid not clannish, Petty men are clannish and not harmonious＂, which is the core concept of the ancient philosophy. The interpersonal theoretician proposes that complementary matching in interpersonal interaction, situation and temperament traits can bring on harmony. However, the social cognitive theoretician regards that the traits uniformity between oneself and the others can lead to harmony, which is by way of cognitive construction and affection. It is put forward in the text that one evaluates interactive harmony with the others by means of each other＇ s valuation to their relationship in the China＇ s traditional culture.

关 键 词：相似性 互补性 和谐 关系性互补 

分 类 号：B222.2[哲学宗教—中国哲学]