检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李凤伟[1] 杜修力[1] 张明聚[1] 高云昊[1]
出 处:《北京工业大学学报》2012年第2期167-172,共6页Journal of Beijing University of Technology
基 金:北京市科技计划课题(Y060506000007022)
摘 要:层次分析法(analytic hierarchy process,AHP)被广泛应用于多准则决策分析中.但是,采用AHP方法构造出的判断矩阵(comparison matrix,CM)不容易满足一致性的要求.本文采用改进的AHP对元素按重要程度进行排序赋值来构造CM.通过对明挖地铁车站的风险源进行辨识,利用改进的AHP能有效地提取信息,方便快捷地构造判断矩阵,提高风险辨识的准确性.该方法计算出的风险源分布情况和已有的统计调查结果基本符合.The analytic hierarchy process(AHP) approach is applied to solving multi-criteria decision-making(MCDM) problems in many areas.However,the comparison matrix(CM) is not "consistent" within a limit of a consistency measure.An improved AHP(IAHP) is proposed to improve CM consistency by using a sorting methodology to determine CM.A case study is presented to illustrate the advantages,in terms of CMs consistency and information extraction effectiveness,when IAHP was applied to risk identification during an open-cut subway construction.The distribution of the risks calculated by IAHP is in accordance with the available statistical findings.
分 类 号:U231[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.83