不同基因型烟叶品质的对比分析  被引量:6

Contrast Analysis of Tobacco Leaf Quality of Different Genotypes

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:徐明康[1,2] 万辉[1] 钱宇[2] 卢剑[3] 刘挺[3] 钟钏[3] 高峻[2] 吴福如[2] 于建军[1] 

机构地区:[1]河南农业大学烟草学院国家烟草栽培生理生化研究基地,河南郑州450002 [2]四川省烟草公司凉山州分公司,四川西昌615000 [3]四川省烟草公司凉山州分公司会理县营销部,四川会理615100

出  处:《江西农业学报》2012年第1期56-59,62,共5页Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi

基  金:国家烟草专卖局资助项目"攀西优质烟叶生产科技示范基地建设"(110200401003)

摘  要:对凉山会东烟区3个不同基因型烤烟的外观质量、物理特性、化学成分以及中性致香物质含量进行了对比分析。结果表明:(1)从不同基因型来看,红花大金元整体外观质量较好,物理特性和化学成分及其组成比例含量较为适宜,中性致香物质整体含量最高。(2)从不同部位来看,这3种基因型的中、上部叶的外观质量整体较好,物理特性和化学成分含量及其组成比例含量适宜,中性致香物质含量最高。(3)综合分析认为,红花大金元的整体质量最好,其更为适宜在凉山会东烟区推广种植。The appearance quality,physical properties,chemical compositions and neutral aroma substance content of three flue-cured tobacco genotypes in Huidong area of Liangshan state were compared and analyzed.The results indicated that:(1) Among 3 genotypes,Honghuadajinyuan showed better general appearance quality,more appropriate physical properties as well as chemical compositions and their contents,and the highest neutral aroma substance content as a whole.(2) From the visual angle of different tobacco leaf parts,the middle and upper leaves of these three genotypes had better appearance quality in general,their physical properties as well as chemical compositions and contents were more suitable,and their neutral aroma substance contents were the highest.(3) Through comprehensive analysis,Honghuadajinyuan had the best whole quality,and it is more appropriate to popularize and plant this flue-cured genotype in Huidong area.

关 键 词:烟叶 外观质量 物理特性 化学成分 中性致香物质 

分 类 号:S572.033[农业科学—烟草工业]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象