检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海市闸北区北站医院肿瘤科,200070 [2]上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院,200025
出 处:《实用癌症杂志》2012年第1期61-63,共3页The Practical Journal of Cancer
摘 要:目的比较分析MINE与ICE方案治疗复发难治性淋巴瘤的临床疗效及安全性。方法对56例复发难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)患者,分别采用MINE与ICE 2种不同的方案化疗,每组各28例。比较2组患者的近期疗效、生活质量状况及不良反应。结果 MINE组和ICE组的有效率分别为60.7%和67.9%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);MINE组Karnofsky评分改善情况显著优于ICE组,差异均有统计学意义;2组骨髓抑制与脱发无显著性差异,而MINE组的胃肠道反应较ICE组轻,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 MINE与ICE 2种化疗方案的近期疗效相当,但MINE在改善患者生活质量及减轻消化道副反应方面有一定的优势,可作为一线方案耐药后的首选补救方案。Objective To compare the effect and safety of MINE and ICE Regimen in the treatment of relapsed and refractory lymphoma.Methods 56 patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma(NHL)were treated by MINE(n=28) or ICE(n=28) Regimen.Short-term effect,quality of life and main toxicities were compared and analyzed after chemotherapy treatments.Results The effective rate for the two group were 60.7% and 67.9%,respectively(P0.05).After chemotherapy treatment,the score of Karnofsky in MINE group improved more remarkedly than those in ICE group(P0.05).There was no significant difference on the main toxicities of myelosuppression and alopecia between MINE and ICE group(P0.05),while the gastrointestinal symptoms in MINE group was significantly lower than that in ICE group(P0.05).Conclusion MINE and ICE Regimen have similar effect for NHL.MINE Regimen has certain superiority on the improvement of quality of life and reduction of gastrointestinal symptoms,so it can be used as a first remedial program after first-line drug resistance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43