间歇性内分泌药物治疗晚期前列腺癌的疗效观察  被引量:4

Efficacy and Safety of Intermittent Hormonal therapy(IHT) in Advanced Prostate Cancer Patients

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:安蜀昆[1] 金松 李松[2] 赵少坚[2] 于跃平[2] 

机构地区:[1]云南省第二人民医院科教科,云南昆明650021 [2]云南省第二人民医院泌尿外科,云南昆明650021

出  处:《中国医药指南》2012年第4期28-29,共2页Guide of China Medicine

摘  要:目的间歇性内分泌药物治疗(IHT)晚期前列腺癌的疗效及安全性。方法回顾分析IHT晚期前列腺癌患者36例,其中黄体生成素释放激素类似物(LHRHa)联合应用比卡鲁胺28例(A组);单纯睾丸切除术8例(B组)。分析比较两组患者在临床表现,血清PSA值,生存率,药物不良反应等方面的差异。结果 A组患者症状缓解率为80.8%(18/28),B组患者症状缓解率为70.6(3/8);A组PSA值由治疗前的143.3(18.7~996.8)ng/mL下降至15.8(0.02~28.9)ng/mL,B组由治疗前的142.3(27.1~988.0)ng/mL下降至27.6(6.0~62.1)ng/mL;A组生化复发率为34.6%(9/28),B组为58.3%(5~8)个月;A组生化复发时间为22(6~65个月A组为10(6~56)个月;A组病死率为25%(7/28),B组病死率为75%(6/8)。服用比卡鲁胺持续用药患者85.5%(22/28)服药期间无明显药物不良反应。结论 IHT应用比卡鲁胺治疗前列腺癌安全、有效。Objective To compare the efficacy, safety and side-effects of IHT of advanced prostate cancer patients. Methods Thirty-six advanced prostate cancer patients were treated with hormonal therapy.The patients were divided into 2 groups, of 28 patients(groupA) used IHT; 8 patients (groupB) were treated with castration only. The difference of clinical symptoms, serum PSA, survival rate, and side-effects of 2 groups were compared. Results The relief rates of group A 80.8%(18/28), groupB 70.6%(3/8). The mean serum PSA of group A decreased from 144.3(18.7-996.8)ng/mL to 15.8(0.02-28.9)ng/ml, group B decreased from 142.3(27.1-988.0)ng/mL to 27.6(6.0-62.1)ng/mL. The mean chemical recurrence rates of group A 34.6%(9/28), group B 58.3%(5/8). The mean chemical recurrence time of group A 22(6-65) month, group B 10(6-56) month. The mortality rates of group A 25%(7/28), group B 75%(6/8). 85.5%(22/28) of group A were treated with IHT continuously, the side-effects rate of group A was low. Conelusion Bicalutamide is effective and safe as IHT for prostate cancer patients.

关 键 词:前列腺癌 间歇性内分泌治疗 比卡鲁胺 

分 类 号:R737.25[医药卫生—肿瘤]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象